Search results

Please note: See above post. And it's been almost 4 years since the OP has last posted anything. Buying/selling stuff in the open forums is not OK. If you need something, please post an ad in the Classifieds - Parts Wanted section.

I did: there is no UOC for the tie rod ends, at least. According to TM9-2320-280-24P, Fig. 170, both parts (RH =2530-01-189-2195; LH = 2530-01-197-2160) are the same for all variants.

That. Leave the locknut (sorry, lockwasher that is...) out and check your torque frequently, especially at the beginning, after every (short) trip. Eventually (and gradually) that arm will slide up a few more mm until it stopped moving any further. Pretty sure at that point it got as tight as...

That would be great; just let us know.

Difference is .23" (almost 1/4 inch longer than stock) I will have to take a closer look, too. You are right that the hub won't interfere. I think there is a reason for them studs to be kind of short. But it wouldn't be the first time I'm wrong...

Haha.... I just came back from my shop, after checking exactly that! See my post above, now edited.

Careful: original studs are shorter, on both ends. You certainly don't want them to protrude too far! Sadly, none of the typical bolts & nuts suppliers have the exact size studs, so you must go with the 2.0in-lenght and trim them down, on both sides. Edit: I just checked one of those...

http://www.steelsoldiers.com/upload/M35/TM9-2320-209-20-3-2.pdf Chapter 13, pages 63-72

Take a look at my sectional drawing of a typical HMMWV tire/wheel assembly.... (everything is exactly to scale) I'm sure you can see the reason now, for my response in post #25

:ditto: ... if we are talking about runflats. Not to be confused with plain bead locks (which I strongly recommend using instead of runflats, in all cases. That one I must disagree...

:ditto:

Not.....?? Even after you wrote this: "It seems "Sonnax" which is a major transmission parts supplier and builder of high performance transmission parts has just released a new "forward/ direct drum" assembly for the TH400 transmission. It is the first one addressing some major issues that only...

I believe your NSN 5306-01-417-2467 is correct for the 24-bolt wheels. Compared to the ones of the early 12-bolt wheels ( NSN: 5306013367175) , the ribbed shoulder of the later style bolts is a few mm longer. I think that's the only difference.

I can confirm that those two on the HMMWV IP are std Packard connectors, too.

:ditto:

I guess it's the seal #5 you are referring to? Part number 4036431, NSN 5330-01-033-3167

You can have one, original, NIB - if you're willing to pay $43 for the shipping door-to-door via USPS. (I have like 50 of them and really no use for it...)

Do it for free, yes... but In a day?? Good luck with that...! And don't forget that the starter will be on the wrong side, just where you want the R-L motor mount to be....

I've yet to find one of these that couldn't be fixed to work again as it should - for a good while at least. Insufficient- or deteriorated lubricant is the main problem, most often.