Search results

Here's the latest reply from SEMA Auto Network regarding the Colorado situation: "Your follow up on the topic is appreciated. Yes, our team has connected with local stakeholders in Colorado about an effort to correct the situation for surplus military vehicles. The Collector Car Council of...

Just remember they will continue to spread their poison whenever they go!

Nothing has happened since 2019.

Doesn't sound like the legislation changed the DOR's mind.... Colorado has had too many Commiefornians move in... Say hello to Commierado...... "Apr 25, 2022 — With the help of folks that signed this petition, and the efforts of the Military Vehicle Collectors of Colorado SB 19-054 was enacted...

The irony is that some little DMV person made it their point to interpret the law according to their own political leaning.... just to exercise their power. Meanwhile the politicians clearly never intended the law to be interpreted this way but they haven't done anything except pass the blame...

Update: The bill passed both chambers and is now pending before Governor Kevin Stitt for final approval.

I'm not in CO so couldn't join a Class suit against a CO law if I wanted to. My beef, with the SS membership, from the beginning when I posted about these infringements is that most of the membership here was only interested in supporting legislation in favor of allowing/protecting "historical"...

The only time a suit may come to be an avenue is if they rescind our titles/licenses rendering our trucks into very expensive lawn ornaments... Until then, making ourselves know and heard via SAN is probably the best steps we can take. IMO everyone one on here should be contacting them...

Here's an update from SAN about Oklahoma.... Contact your lawmaker and demand support for HB 3179!! This is showing that the trend is reversible. I still encourage all to contact SAN/SEMA at the email address I posted earlier. This should show us that they ARE aware and involved. Overview...

I have been in touch with the SEMA Auto Network. They have been active in fighting these restrictions, but their efforts are not focused on those of us who buy a decommissioned rig for personal, business or recreational use. It's not just one state doing this... unfortunately it's a political...

I There are many who think this was exactly that. Not only willingly, but willing to report others deemed to be in violation.... without a single shot fired...

If you look at all the constitutional rights we have compromised due to COVID-19, losing the right to own and drive our trucks on roads is barely on the radar....

I'm in Ohio and my '98 M1079 titled as an RV without a problem. After investing $1000's in just upgrades to the basic rig, in addition to the costs of the RV components, "Historical" or "Offroad" use doesn't do me a bit of good. Maybe a baseless worry, but once things become laws in some...

So the historical guys are sitting rosy, the rest of the owners are screwed... just like I predicted...

I'm still curious about the legality of this new law...

I hope the club is advocating for ALL MV owners, not just the historical ones...

While there is mention of Expedition vehicle builders, there is scant mention in this thread of the private owners who in many cases have invested thousands into their former LMTV/FMTV rigs. These individual owners who purchased a truck when it was perfectly legal to do so with the intent of on...