Search results

That is EXACTLY what I wanted to hear. I haven't seen one of the broken cases but that pretty much sums up my suspicions. With the low range, the low trans reverse gear, plus the general rule of thumb is a 2:1 ratio reduction for the torque converter...that's one HECK of a lot of torque there...

I was under over the weekend and saw the switch you're talking about. Yeah, that sucker is out of there for sure. I'LL pull the front axle in when I want it in. Any thoughts on the reverse gear, front drive axle engaged, medievil driving, busted case VS reverse gear, front axle NOT engage...

Okay...I kinda think I may be onto something here and would you guys that think on things to really re-read the above. I also think a set of lock out for the M939 Series trucks would reduce the T-case breakage issue even further as the only time you would have all that super heavy front...

Wait a minute...REALLY?! Low range automatically locks in the front axle?! If this is right, well no friggin wonder they're breaking T-cases in reverse in low range because you won't just spin the tandems, the locked in front axle will have all the traction in the world! You'll have enough...