scottladdy
Member
- 538
- 8
- 18
- Location
- CT
OK, so strong disclaimer. This is my experience with one and only one sample. This may or may not represent what you will experience. I and others have purchased many other items from LMC with satisfaction.
Moderators: If this does not belong in this forum please feel free to move it. I started this thread in the CUCV main forum since this applies specifically to CUCV's and is not a customization or hot rodding related item.
I wanted to document and share my experience in replacing the right bed side of my M1008 with an LMC replacement panel. I ordered the bed side with the square fuel filler door as I installed a second fuel tank to increase my operating range.The panel arrived within a few weeks of being ordered, truck freight. It was very well packaged and on initial inspection looked good. No obvious dents, and while the stamping didn't match the quality of any of the OE panels I have used in the past the "pretty" surfaces looked very servicable. I fully expected to have to perform some work on the panel, as even the OE panels I have used have all required a little body work. I also expected the steel to be of a thinner gauge than stock, which it was but still a LOT thicker than modern cars heavy foil .
The issues arose when I began to install the panel on the bed. I had removed the entire bed and had it supported on heavy duty saw horses which gave me full access to the bed.
List of issues I discovered:
That is as far as I took it before I decided to punt and weld a fuel door into the OE panel and perform the necessary body work I was hoping my more than $400 investment would preclude.In short, for a quick replacement on a work or mud/off road truck that just needs to function it could be made to work with the exception of the fuel filler opening. However, if you are looking for a decent replacement, at least this sample would not pass muster. Your mileage may vary.
Moderators: If this does not belong in this forum please feel free to move it. I started this thread in the CUCV main forum since this applies specifically to CUCV's and is not a customization or hot rodding related item.
I wanted to document and share my experience in replacing the right bed side of my M1008 with an LMC replacement panel. I ordered the bed side with the square fuel filler door as I installed a second fuel tank to increase my operating range.The panel arrived within a few weeks of being ordered, truck freight. It was very well packaged and on initial inspection looked good. No obvious dents, and while the stamping didn't match the quality of any of the OE panels I have used in the past the "pretty" surfaces looked very servicable. I fully expected to have to perform some work on the panel, as even the OE panels I have used have all required a little body work. I also expected the steel to be of a thinner gauge than stock, which it was but still a LOT thicker than modern cars heavy foil .
The issues arose when I began to install the panel on the bed. I had removed the entire bed and had it supported on heavy duty saw horses which gave me full access to the bed.
List of issues I discovered:
- The bedside bowed outwards, it was not straight and did not align well with the bed floor.
- The top rail was spot welded too high on the inside and canted heavily outboard.
- The mounting positions for the tailgate bumpers were not properly aligned.
- The front did not have proper clearance around the embossing in the header panel.
- The upper front of the panel was not properly cut back to clear the header.
- The taillight recess was malformed. Tail light would not fit flush.
- Due to #2 the side was significantly higher than the tailgate.
- The rear of the panel stood very proud of the tailgate when properly closed.
- The beauty lines did not match (off slightly and for a work truck not a big deal but providing full transparency).
- The tailgate made contact with the panel at the bottom when closed.
- The spot welds at the bottom rear of the panel were highly unfinished.
- The fuel door outer surface was concave, not slightly convex like OE, and heavily rippled.
- The fuel door opening was approximately 11/16" too high, preventing mounting of the fuel filler.
- A number of mounting locations were off enough to require significant work.
That is as far as I took it before I decided to punt and weld a fuel door into the OE panel and perform the necessary body work I was hoping my more than $400 investment would preclude.In short, for a quick replacement on a work or mud/off road truck that just needs to function it could be made to work with the exception of the fuel filler opening. However, if you are looking for a decent replacement, at least this sample would not pass muster. Your mileage may vary.
Attachments
-
38.4 KB Views: 25
-
39.5 KB Views: 22
-
57.2 KB Views: 24
-
40.3 KB Views: 23
-
45 KB Views: 23
-
40.5 KB Views: 27
-
47.2 KB Views: 31
-
39.8 KB Views: 24
Last edited: