• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

Difference Between M35A2s?

stb64

Member
162
15
18
Location
hohenfels germany
One other difference while looking around in the front frame area is the old and new style winch mounts.
Right, but it is hard to determine which one is the old and which one is the new style .
I have a 1954 TM 9-8022 and it clearly shows both styles.11aug2014 024.jpg11aug2014 022.jpg
 

stb64

Member
162
15
18
Location
hohenfels germany
The old style is the welded set.
That's what i would think, as the pressed steel style is a more advanced technology, but now my question is, when was the design changed?
And why, if the ''new'' style was made from at least 1954 (call that new), do so many later trucks have the welded set?
It almost seems that for some time both styles were in production.
 

hndrsonj

Senior Chief/Moderator
Super Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
7,584
363
83
Location
Cheyenne, WY
That's what i would think, as the pressed steel style is a more advanced technology, but now my question is, when was the design changed?
And why, if the ''new'' style was made from at least 1954 (call that new), do so many later trucks have the welded set?
It almost seems that for some time both styles were in production.
I'll have to look in my manuals (I have most from 49 on) to see when they both showed up. I am guessing that the reason so many had the welded extensions later on is due to units looking up the part numbers in the older manuals and ordering extensions based on the older part number until the number was cancelled and then they had to use the updated p/n in the newer manuals. (just my guess)
 

hndrsonj

Senior Chief/Moderator
Super Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
7,584
363
83
Location
Cheyenne, WY
The 1952 manuals have the welded style extensions. The 1954 manuals have both.
 

clinto

Moderator, wonderful human being & practicing Deuc
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
Supporting Vendor
12,596
1,132
113
Location
Athens, Ga.
Ok, here's the early style A1 (and early A2-this is my '67 KJ M35A2) mount:

20140812_193937[1].jpg20140812_193951[1].jpg20140812_193958[1].jpg

And here's a sagging mount on a low mileage (14K mile, verified with all paperwork since the truck was new), never deployed USAF truck that's reasonably new (1988):

20140812_194025[1].jpg

Clinto, can you please post a picture of the reinforcement, so that i can see if this is the one that was in the PS magazine ?
If so, i would like to replicate it, to reinforce my crossmember before it starts cracking. Of course, any information about it, from anybody, will be appreciated.
I would really hate it having to replace my crossmember, the truck has less than 1000 original miles on it, and has never been rebuilt.

As requested. This truck was Army, Field Artillery Unit, came from Albany, Ga. MCLB in 2012. It's a '69 or '70 (can't remember):

20140812_194135[1].jpg20140812_194121[1].jpg20140812_194109[1].jpg
 

stb64

Member
162
15
18
Location
hohenfels germany
Thanks Clinto!
The repair in your picture is almost identical to the one i saw in the PS magazine.
I searched PS magazine online and found an article in issue 209 April 1970, page 46. There has to be another article in another issue, i will seach for it, as i remember the picture looked somewhat different.
According to the PS Mag article, there is a TB with repair instructions, TB 750-981-4 (oct 69), I will have to search for that, too.

12aug2014 007.jpg
The picture shows the engine support welded to the crossmember at the top of flange.
 

bchauvette

New member
810
12
0
Location
Easley SC USA, 29640
Now I have to go put flame retardant clothes on for when certain other members complained that I told you to read the manuals.[/QUOTE]

Aw yes the infamous "FLAMING WAGGING FINGER". Throws out flaming meteors .
 

dmetalmiki

Well-known member
5,523
2,028
113
Location
London England
My other question is motors. AFAIK all M35A2s are Multifuel. Is this correct? Did they put turbos on just random A2s or how was that determined?

The answer to your question is: nasakik kfcvgtok?, AFAIK.
Read the forum rules before posting!.
 

Buck Wampum

Active member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
64
132
33
Location
SE PA
HI here is the 1st type the M34 also known as the Eager Beaver this is mine.View attachment 508911
Sorry to dig up an old thread, but can you let me know if your M34 has Detroit lockers and 19-spline axle shafts? I own a V-100 armored car and it uses what are reputed to be M34 axles. Dimensionally (externally) identical to an M35-series axles, but has heavier 19-spline (instead of M35 16-spline) axles and Detroit Lockers front and rear. I've never seen an M34 in person, so very curious to learn if the M34 axle was a direct transplant into the V-100.

Thanks,
Scott
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks