• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

Allison HT740 transmission

juanprado

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
5,614
2,922
113
Location
Metairie/La (N'awlins)
Technical Characteristics ( ILs ) 2520-01-347-7646
MRCRequirementReply
AGAV END ITEM IDENTIFICATION M915 SERIES TRUCK,CARGO 6X4 TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY WITH CONTAINER
[HR][/HR]
 

tim292stro

Well-known member
2,118
41
48
Location
S.F. Bay Area/California
Anything with an SAE #1 flywheel that put out 445HP or less at 1400ft-lbs or less peak torque. Really common in the private sector too - my Bus has one.

One thing to watch for - the lock-up clutch on the military version is aggressive, this is why they had to put anti-lock brakes in the M939 series trucks. Guys were stomping on the brakes and the lock-up clutch wouldn't release, killing the engine and thus the power steering.

[Edit:] Should note, the lock-up clutch is accessible via a hydraulic port - you can add a solenoid valve and make the lock-up clutch controllable. I have a full factory service manual if you have any questions [/Edit]
 
Last edited:

maxtor

New member
274
3
0
Location
California
Thanks for the information. I have been looking for a spare MT654CR trans "just in case" ours goes out in the future. I wonder what it would take to modify the HT740 trans to fit our M923a2 trucks.
 

tim292stro

Well-known member
2,118
41
48
Location
S.F. Bay Area/California
This tripped me the heck out since I was just writing a post in this thread discussing Allison Automatic options for an ISX swap - got my thread mixed up (where's the post I just did!!).

In general, it's my belief that the MT654 and HT740 share the external case part, so I think (check the measurements yourself) the HT740 should just be a drop in. There will probably be a few parts you'd have to transfer over (modulator input, shifter) but other than that it should be stupid easy :). These were designed around SAE standardized mounting fixtures and package sizes - once you go bigger than a pickup-truck, it actually gets easier to mix and match.
 
Last edited:

bigboy44

Member
409
2
18
Location
Ava, MO.
This tripped me the heck out since I was just writing a post in this thread discussing Allison Automatic options for an ISX swap - got my thread mixed up (where's the post I just did!!).

In general, it's my belief that the MT654 and HT740 share the external case part, so I think (check the measurements yourself) the HT740 should just be a drop in. There will probably be a few parts you'd have to transfer over (modulator input, shifter) but other than that it should be stupid easy :). These were designed around SAE standardized mounting fixtures and package sizes - once you go bigger than a pickup-truck, it actually gets easier to mix and match.
Would the shifting points be any different? Also I have read a lot of threads on turning up the 6CTA8.3's and the weak points seem to be the trans and transfer cases, would a trans swap leave the transfer the sole weak point. I am thinking of bobbing a 923A2 and turning up the fuel but I would not be adding any cargo to it (heavy loads)! I would think the transfer could handle the extra power with a lot less weight. Please give me some in put.
Thanks Warren
 

Suprman

Well-known member
Supporting Vendor
6,861
696
113
Location
Stratford/Connecticut
The HT740 is a 4-speed auto. I believe the shift points in both transmissions are adjustable, to a point at least. The M939 trucks are geared low so you may loose some top end with the 740 trans. It is very popular in busses, motor homes, garbage trucks and other heavy vehicles. The HT750 is a 5 speed that may be a better choice for the 5 ton.
Will
 

maxtor

New member
274
3
0
Location
California
Manual says 55 mph maximum speed. I don't know how fast it will go. I only have had it up to 50 mph so far.
Just brought home a M1101 tonight. Can't wait to see how it fits behind the M923a2.
 

lakeydna

Member
86
3
8
Location
Devon, AB
The HT740 is a 4-speed auto. I believe the shift points in both transmissions are adjustable, to a point at least. The M939 trucks are geared low so you may loose some top end with the 740 trans. It is very popular in busses, motor homes, garbage trucks and other heavy vehicles. The HT750 is a 5 speed that may be a better choice for the 5 ton.
Will
top end speed shouldn't change as the final gear in both units is 1:1/direct
 

quickfarms

Well-known member
3,495
25
48
Location
Orange Junction, CA
The shift points in all of the Allison's are adjustable and need to be set to match the governed RPM of the engine. Unfortunately this requires removing the pan to do the adjustments and it is recommended to do it on a dyno and not in the truck.

There are also multiple torque converters available for each transmission.

The MT654CR transmission is considered obsolete by allison

Unfortunately most of the transmissions in the 939 series trucks are not set up to allison specifications.
 

lakeydna

Member
86
3
8
Location
Devon, AB
The shift points in all of the

The MT654CR transmission is considered obsolete by allison

Unfortunately most of the transmissions in the 939 series trucks are not set up to allison specifications.
Tell me about it. WAJAX an Allison/Detroit diesel service center told me the MT654CR was a mismatch transmission to a 6CTA engine when I was trying to get the valve body adjusted.
 

tim292stro

Well-known member
2,118
41
48
Location
S.F. Bay Area/California
There's a reason the military killed the 939 series. AM General made the wining design but the government gave later production of that design to BMY-Harsco who did a really bad execution of design cost-reduction, kind of like Stewart&Stevenson with the LMTV drive-train design issues. Even ABS later was a band-aid rather than a fix of the bad engine/transmission pairing, an even more futile fix for the fatal roll-overs was the later "high-tops" with built in ROPS, which unfortunately only protects the in-cab crew, and not the equipment or soldiers in the back (so what's the point the military asked in summary?).

M923A2_hightop.jpg

BMY-Harsco is not primarily in the business of building vehicles.
Stewart&Stevenson is not primarily in the business of building vehicles.

This mismatch and basic design screw-ups is what you get when companies are picked to build vehicles where they have no experience.
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks