• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

Weasling in with an Army CJ5 rebuild

Hoefler

Active member
1,096
20
38
Location
White Bear Lake,MN
Its a civilian Jeep bought and put into service by the US Army-so I figure its ok to post here. This '77 Jeep was won on GL and came out of Sparta. It served as a fire truck in a presumably dry area. No rust anywhere. Took a bit to get her to run, but unfortunately, the transmission has water in it. The rubber boot on tunnel cover was missing. Guessing that rain ran down shift lever and ruined transmission. Engine is the 232 (smaller version of the venerable 258). Ran terrible which required a carb rebuild and a new HEI distributor.
One thing lead to another which ended up doing a body off fix. I have swapped out the T150 3-speed with a T18 four speed and Dana 20. Replaced the sagging leaf springs and shocks along with bushings and new beefy shackles. Replaced the rear floor due to a big jagged hole cut into original for water pump piping. Sandblasted the underside and prime and painted with Rapco desert tan. Sandblasted the frame and coated with Eastwood ceramic frame paint. Just got the body sitting on frame this weekend.
I plan on painting the rest of the body in desert tan and same color lineX. Will post up more photos as the Jeep more progress is made.
Pete
 

Attachments

jeeplvr247

New member
619
10
0
Location
Ferndale, MI
Very cool. Any CJ with no rust is a rare find. Have you considered keeping the exterior the same? It might be a cool way to recognize its past.
 

mutt1966

Member
284
13
18
Location
Allentown, PA
Its a CJ-5, I'd like to ask what is the color of the engine and trans and who makes it a very close match for the paint they used on the 225ci V-6 that Iam restoring for my 1971 CJ-5
 

M813rc

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
4,218
3,260
113
Location
Near Austin, Texas
As far as our club is concerned, (and fortunately, in Texas HMV registration law) most any vehicle once used by the military is an MV. Your jeep certainly fits.

Is the fire gear going to be part of the restoration? It is an interesting vehicle, I'd love to see a few more "before" pictures, if you might post them?

Cheers
 

Hoefler

Active member
1,096
20
38
Location
White Bear Lake,MN
I have not planned on putting the tank back in. It requires the front seat to be pushed far forward making it tough to get in and out. I have kept the truck stock outside of the tank stuff. The tank itself has two powered hose reals on it. The pump was on the front but was missing. There is a nice winch that was mounted on the rear-I may relocate to the front.
My plan was to paint entire vehicle in desert tan and have the seats recovered in canvas. The seats are interesting-they are black vinyl with the seating portion having canvas inserts.
Here are some interesting pictures of it. I have more on another computer-will post when I find them. The image with the old guy was taken on the day I recovered it from Sparta. That old guy is my wifes uncle from Queens. He went with to help recover it.
Pete
 

Attachments

Scar59

Active member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,811
41
38
Location
Mt. Eden, KY
Cool build.

I have the 232 in 74 cj 5 I beat around off road. The engine is more than capable of pulling the jeep.
I also have a '74 w/ factory hard top, originally issued to the USMC, data plates still attached to the dash. In the shed waiting restoration. Seeing Pete's work, gives me hope.
 

KaiserM109

New member
1,108
4
0
Location
SE Aurora, CO
It is a CJ5 , CJ7's had a longer wheelbase and the door cutout was pretty much square .
You seem to be more familiar with the different models of Jeeps, so I will defer to you.

I was saying it was not a 5 because the 5s I was familiar with and my '70 Commando had a shorter fender where the wheel opening went all the way back to the end of the fender sheet metal. I looked on the Internet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeep_CJ#CJ-5 and found it a bit confusing:

If you look at the CJ5 it has the short fender and round door. If you look at the CJ7 it has the long fender and the square door. Some early CJ5s had the cover over the battery hole for the M38, but I don't see that on this one.

I know that Jeep, particularly pre-1970, changed things in the middle of the year, so I won't try to second guess things.
 

Attachments

m16ty

Moderator
Moderator
Steel Soldiers Supporter
9,580
218
63
Location
Dickson,TN
You seem to be more familiar with the different models of Jeeps, so I will defer to you.

I was saying it was not a 5 because the 5s I was familiar with and my '70 Commando had a shorter fender where the wheel opening went all the way back to the end of the fender sheet metal. I looked on the Internet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeep_CJ#CJ-5 and found it a bit confusing:

If you look at the CJ5 it has the short fender and round door. If you look at the CJ7 it has the long fender and the square door. Some early CJ5s had the cover over the battery hole for the M38, but I don't see that on this one.

I know that Jeep, particularly pre-1970, changed things in the middle of the year, so I won't try to second guess things.
Once you see the difference in the door openings, there's no mistaking a cj5 for a cj7. All cj5s have a rounded back door opening and narrow at the bottom. The cj7 is pretty much as wide at the bottom as it is at the top and goes straight up in the back. The cj7 didn't come about until 1976.
 

mutt1966

Member
284
13
18
Location
Allentown, PA
Up to 1971 they are called Short Nose CJ-5's, 1972 brought you the inline 6cyl. and the 304cu in 8 cyl. those are the Long Nose CJ-5's the tub dimensions remained the same... 1976 on the frame, tub, just about everything changed...
 

KaiserM109

New member
1,108
4
0
Location
SE Aurora, CO
Up to 1971 they are called Short Nose CJ-5's, 1972 brought you the inline 6cyl. and the 304cu in 8 cyl. those are the Long Nose CJ-5's the tub dimensions remained the same... 1976 on the frame, tub, just about everything changed...
I suspected the length of the hood and fenders had something to do with the engine. My Commando had the Buick 225 V6 which was short. Thanks for that clarification.
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks