Chainbreaker
Well-known member
- 1,797
- 1,995
- 113
- Location
- Oregon
Yes there is some element of chance that if you elect to bypass a safety shutdown switch you could leave yourself open to an actual unmonitored failure if running on an extended basis. A chance that one has to weigh against the situation at hand whether its worth the risk to keep on running. However...now after your comment and thinking about it from a critical operational standpoint it is probably just as easy to jumper each switch independently and only bypassing the offending switch, after determining its only due to a defective switch and not an ACTUAL oil pressure or a high temperature condition. Doing it that way, you are preserving the integrity of the safety circuit to monitor the other operational switch. I have both S4/S5 switches stocked as spares and a spare generator to boot. So for me it just a matter of quick troubleshooting.The only problem with a battle short, is what happens when you do lose oil pressure? Or it overheats? But yes, it can be handy, in a pinch. I only had to use Battle Short a few times, and we would check the set lots more often. I never understood why the 002 and 003 never had a battle short.
Again thanks for the safety circuit TB5-8 to TB5-9 jumpering troubleshooting tip, its a quick way to determine if "anything" in that circuit (loose/broken wire, switch, etc.) is causing a shut down condition.