More Multifuel exhaust brake discussion
Hey guys, this thread has gone stale and I hope to revive it. I’ll be sending PM’s to some folks that posted here and ask that they reply to the thread (vs PM) so everyone can see it. I’m searching posts, but haven’t quite found what I’m looking for.
I think there’s a fair amount of interest in adding an exhaust brake to the M35A2 trucks with multifuel engines (saving wear on service brakes and providing additional braking capability on grades). I think the potential interest in an exhaust brake for the 800 series truck is likely lower than M35A2’s based on the fact that full Jake brakes are available for the NHC-250 engines and the Canadian trucks have Jakes anyway.
From my understanding of exhaust brakes there is a finite limit to the amount of back pressure the brake can generate based on the limitation of the exhaust valves floating (i.e. not returning to their seat or following the intended opening and closing lift profile). This is different for each engine design, operating conditions (especially RPM), etc. As a result, the back pressure is limited by a method such as keeping the butterfly valve cracked a bit, orifice(s) in the butterfly valve, a bypass valve (like a waste gate) or other pressure-sensitive valve arrangement to limit backpressure to safe operating levels. I think the setting for each particular engine\truck\etc. is typically determined empirically, i.e. experimentation with a particular setup. I imagine that PACBRAKE and other get their hands on a new truck and take measurements, then design their brake not to exceed that backpressure level. Does anyone here have experience with this sort of thing, especially for multifuels?
I put in a call to PACBRAKE and have a list of things to follow up with them. I'm hoping the replies here in the coming days help me with getting more answers.
Would anyone please PM me all of the numbers and markings on their multifuel turbo?