- 6,070
- 4,439
- 113
I've been contemplating fabricating heavy bumpers for CUCVs. I don't have a CUCV but I have access to a bumper off of a 1988 k5 blazer and intermittent access to that truck for measurements. If I make the bumpers to fit this k5 will they also fit the CUCV? My research says yes, but I want to be sure.
I'm looking at several designs, and may make some of each design. The other post from 2012 shows a good design that I like a lot and plan to duplicate, but that is more along the lines of a high end aftermarket civvy bumper.
I'm also approaching this from the angle of "how would the military have done it", in a no frills utilitarian mindset. Here are Some of my ideas:
1) Using C-channel to make something very similar in appearance and function to the bumper and frame extensions on my M925, with integrated winch mount and with steel pipe brushguard. Lose the OEM shackle mounts and add some similar in location to the M939 series trucks. Essentially a CUCV version of the M939 bumper. Maybe use 5" angle instead of C-channel...
2) just plain rectangular structural steel tubing (8x4?) with steel plate frame extensions to mount to the truck frame. Shackle mounts as above. No integrated winch mount. Brushguard roughly identical to OEM.
3) rear bumpers similar to #2 above.
The CUCVs in general are square. This tempts me to use square tubing for the brush guards. Opinions?
The general square nature of the CUCVs dissuades me from just using round schedule 40 pipe for the main body of the bumper.
I'd finish these in plain rattlecan flat black. That would go well with any color vehicle and is cheap and easy to touch up.
I'm thinking I can hit a price point on these no frills bumpers at under $2 per lb. This is half to 2/3 the cost of the high end civvy bumpers. I'm not looking for any committed buyers at this point. I'm just looking for general level of interest and some feedback and ideas. You may see some of these appear on the SS classifieds over the next few weeks.
98G
I'm looking at several designs, and may make some of each design. The other post from 2012 shows a good design that I like a lot and plan to duplicate, but that is more along the lines of a high end aftermarket civvy bumper.
I'm also approaching this from the angle of "how would the military have done it", in a no frills utilitarian mindset. Here are Some of my ideas:
1) Using C-channel to make something very similar in appearance and function to the bumper and frame extensions on my M925, with integrated winch mount and with steel pipe brushguard. Lose the OEM shackle mounts and add some similar in location to the M939 series trucks. Essentially a CUCV version of the M939 bumper. Maybe use 5" angle instead of C-channel...
2) just plain rectangular structural steel tubing (8x4?) with steel plate frame extensions to mount to the truck frame. Shackle mounts as above. No integrated winch mount. Brushguard roughly identical to OEM.
3) rear bumpers similar to #2 above.
The CUCVs in general are square. This tempts me to use square tubing for the brush guards. Opinions?
The general square nature of the CUCVs dissuades me from just using round schedule 40 pipe for the main body of the bumper.
I'd finish these in plain rattlecan flat black. That would go well with any color vehicle and is cheap and easy to touch up.
I'm thinking I can hit a price point on these no frills bumpers at under $2 per lb. This is half to 2/3 the cost of the high end civvy bumpers. I'm not looking for any committed buyers at this point. I'm just looking for general level of interest and some feedback and ideas. You may see some of these appear on the SS classifieds over the next few weeks.
98G