paulfarber
New member
- 1,081
- 20
- 0
- Location
- Gordon, PA
My point exactly... numbers matter.
Figure out how many car shows would be affected, tell the reps that your state could lose $X dollars in the local economy as more and more antique/classic owners simply stop going rather than deal with IFTA.
It HAS to be about money. Thats how the system works. If you pulled the attendance figures for say Aberdeen, Gilbert, the NJ MTA, the WWII Weekend at Reading, and the other LARGE shows and say look, these things may stop because IFTA is putting privately owned vehicles in jeopardy of fines that were never meant to affect them you cover all the bases:
Lost revenue because events get smaller
Lost State 'prestige' because once great events are not attended.
'For the Children' because these vehicles are the history of the country.
Write you single letter to the reps if you think it will help... but don't be surprised if nothing happens.
Figure out how many car shows would be affected, tell the reps that your state could lose $X dollars in the local economy as more and more antique/classic owners simply stop going rather than deal with IFTA.
It HAS to be about money. Thats how the system works. If you pulled the attendance figures for say Aberdeen, Gilbert, the NJ MTA, the WWII Weekend at Reading, and the other LARGE shows and say look, these things may stop because IFTA is putting privately owned vehicles in jeopardy of fines that were never meant to affect them you cover all the bases:
Lost revenue because events get smaller
Lost State 'prestige' because once great events are not attended.
'For the Children' because these vehicles are the history of the country.
Write you single letter to the reps if you think it will help... but don't be surprised if nothing happens.