• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

How to turn up a cat

armytruck63

Active member
1,663
10
38
Location
Redlands, CA
Are your fuel and air filters nice and clean? Try changing the filters if they're not clean and this should help some.

But don't expect miracles...
 

AceHigh

Well-known member
2,176
31
48
Location
Lake City FL
Mine does great on the hills, compared to the A2. Mike (Mktopside) did a write-up about cleaning out the plumbing in the exhaust to increase power. Are your filters clean? Yours should do better then it sounds like it is doing.
 

mktopside

Banned
467
6
0
Location
Gainesville, Va
Yea....because there are tons of guys who have had issues with the 3116 in their a3's.....

Please, point to one on this website... I'll be waiting.
 

Coalman

New member
99
0
0
Location
Paxinos Pa
Could you tell me what you mean about cleaning the plumbing I just picked it up and drove about 50 miles but it is really bad on the hills I was thinking about straight piping it
 

AceHigh

Well-known member
2,176
31
48
Location
Lake City FL
Here is Mike's post on the plumbing.

http://www.m35a3.net/forum/index.php/topic,5.0.html

Now quit dissing our engines! They have a long and successful history in marine applications, school busses, fire trucks, and many more. The one issue is the block is solid making rebuilding a tough proposition. Many have gone hundreds of thousands of miles, so they should do just fine in our trucks.
 

mktopside

Banned
467
6
0
Location
Gainesville, Va
Nobody on here turns them up, In the civi world there not great engines. Not as bad as the 3126 but as said, check all your posible restrictions, Fuel too.
They're not bad engines in the civi world by any means. When you get down to brass tacks, the only thing people really have to complain about is the cost of repairs by CAT. Is it reasonable to call it a bad engine because guys have had them fail at 300k miles? Or because it's not resleavable? Go look up total production numbers for the 3116 and tell me it hasn't been a successful motor.



Ace,

I straight piped mine last weekend, it sounds great and isn't any louder than a 5.9 with an exhaust. I'll get some pics up this weekend as soon as I paint over the chrome stack. I'll take some pics of the inside of the stock muffler too, pretty restrictive.
 

SMOKEWAGON66

New member
1,144
21
0
Location
California
ever notice how the guys that dont have them (not always) have nothing but bad things to say about something, and vis versa, the guys who do have them (not always) have nothing but good to say....either way, My opinion of the A3 as a former Army 88m, i dont care for A3's at all. they were a waste of govt money. trying to modernize something that worked fine the way it was so todays generation of kids who were raised to beleive everything should be easy (automatic trannys) for them, could operate them without having to go to school to learn them. Im not sure the amount of money the govt wasted on these abomonations,but i think they shoulda just went with a whole new design that was made for new technology rather then just upgrading old equipment. the A3's my units had were all garbage...never ran, always in the shop. Worthless. thats my opinion anyway. No offense to you guys that have them in any way...im just a bit of a purist when it comes to trucks.
 

mktopside

Banned
467
6
0
Location
Gainesville, Va
ever notice how the guys that dont have them (not always) have nothing but bad things to say about something, and vis versa, the guys who do have them (not always) have nothing but good to say....either way, My opinion of the A3 as a former Army 88m, i dont care for A3's at all. they were a waste of govt money. trying to modernize something that worked fine the way it was so todays generation of kids who were raised to beleive everything should be easy (automatic trannys) for them, could operate them without having to go to school to learn them. Im not sure the amount of money the govt wasted on these abomonations,but i think they shoulda just went with a whole new design that was made for new technology rather then just upgrading old equipment. the A3's my units had were all garbage...never ran, always in the shop. Worthless. thats my opinion anyway. No offense to you guys that have them in any way...im just a bit of a purist when it comes to trucks.
What exactly kept them from running?

Your opinion of them and their worth to the military is irrelevant. Nobody was talking about if it was a good decision to build them or not. What specifically did you have fail on them that kept them off the road?
 

mktopside

Banned
467
6
0
Location
Gainesville, Va
Yup they made alotta 6.2's and 6.5's as well. Guess the gooberment picked them because they where the BEST engine available too.......:cookoo:

Sorry, had to say it.

OP, google has ALOT of info w/ vidios on what you want to do. Less bias as well.

Apples to oranges. Is the CAT unreliable compared to a OTR Cat with a million miles on it? I guess. Compared to a multifuel? Lolololol Or a 6.2, 6.5 or any modern medium duty diesel? How are DT466s past 500k? Everything has to be repaired at some point, the 3116 is no different. It can just be more money to fix.
 

abh3

New member
236
3
0
Location
Florala, Al
@ Smokewagon: Sorry about your unit's luck but I love my A3!

First thing I'd do is the above-mentioned air & fuel filters, then some diagnostics if it's still a dog. I had an ex chicken company FL120 Freightliner w/ a Cat turned up from 'idiot-proof' a few years back by Cat and computer time wasn't that expensive, if the distance isn't too bad it's worth considering...
 

Travis89xj

Member
174
0
18
Location
Gainesville, Florida
neither an A2 or an A3 are going to make it to 500k. I have a friend that works his A2 all the time, has about 35k on it and it already had to have the valves done, and the turbo is worn. Sad part is he does his oil changes and preventative maintenance all the time.

As far as the Auto tranny. My m135 has an auto, its a 1953 and Im a huge fan of the allisons been used for a long time. Same truck mentioned above has also had flywheel and clutch issues.

Guess thats the price for working his truck hard everyday, dont think they were ever meant to be worked long term
 

big block 88

Member
862
17
18
Location
Topeka/Kansas
Nobody on here turns them up, In the civi world there not great engines. Not as bad as the 3126 but as said, check all your posible restrictions, Fuel too.

These statements are based on what facts???? You know little on this subject. The 3116 and 3126 are both very reliable engines with the ability to make decent power. So what they can't be resleeved... With today metalergy there are no reasons to worry about the blocks casting or bore wear. The B50 life of a 3126 is over 250K miles that is ecelent for any medium duty diesel.

As with any turbo diesel add air and fuel and the power will go up.

Let me know when your MF hits even 150K, and see what it has cost you.
 

big block 88

Member
862
17
18
Location
Topeka/Kansas
Yup they made alotta 6.2's and 6.5's as well. Guess the gooberment picked them because they where the BEST engine available too.......:cookoo:

Sorry, had to say it.

OP, google has ALOT of info w/ vidios on what you want to do. Less bias as well.

LOL you also think the 6.2/6.5 detroits are junk... That would also be false, as with any IDI Diesel they will be problematic than the modern DI and CommonRail diesels. Are all Common Rail diesels (6.4 and newer powerjokes, 03 and newer 5.9 Cummins, and all Duramax's) junk because the injectors have more issues than the old 12 valve cummins? No you hear about more issues with these motors because there are WAAAAAAAAAAY more diesels on the road today then there was 10 years ago. Same with the 6.2/6.5 Detroits there are literally million still on the road and off the road and running great.

They may be loud, smelly, crude and under powered when compared to the 5.9 of the day but the price difference at original purchase and repairs will in most aspects be cheaper all around to own and mantain.
 

SMOKEWAGON66

New member
1,144
21
0
Location
California
Smokewagon, you have no idea what you have just unleashed..:shock: HAHAHA :p
lol's...actually i did.

What exactly kept them from running?

Your opinion of them and their worth to the military is irrelevant. Nobody was talking about if it was a good decision to build them or not. What specifically did you have fail on them that kept them off the road?
I know my opinion is irrelevant...it always is. Because im American and have the right to voice my opinion, it doesnt mean anyone has to listen to it or agree, but i can still say it :beer:

as for what kept the A3's from running? I've no idea..i was never a mechanic...just a dumb@*# driver. All i can say is what i saw. Which is that ALL of our A3's were always in the shop...simple observation. [thumbzup]
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks