Wolf.Dose
Active member
- 1,062
- 9
- 38
- Location
- Boehl-Iggelheim, Germany
To my experiance most of the statements above carry a good load of trouth in them. What we have to consider?
The 6.x engines were desigend as normal aspirater´d. the first error was to take the eyhaust gas for the turbo from onla one cylinder bank. And the turbo will not help, if the ip is NOT adjusted for a turbe,so a IP change is required.
For higher alritudes a standard DB28 is nit set. There are settings for hight altitudes availabe (Believe me, I had the Standardine setting list once on hand). As well as the turbo setting, also available fro hight altituedes. And for the na engine everything over 1000 feet is hifgt altitude.
The basic design of the 6.2 l engine can handle more power than the 150 hp, however, the thermodynamics will tell you, Diesel tuning is much different from gas engine tuning. Therefore the Banks turbo is not the most ideal application.
So my conclusion of all these problems is very simple: keep the engine as it is at 150 HP and the therefore given torque. It is a basically 1980's design.
RPM are not so much a problem, if you stay below 3600. For this the engine is designed and will last quit some time. And the engine needs some 500 plus engine hours for brake in or in the M1009 some 80000 miles.
Wolf
14 years with a M1009
Since 2002 with a 6.2 in a M715 (Engine built in 1984 according to the available documentation, got it new out of the box, when I bought it in 1994.)
The 6.x engines were desigend as normal aspirater´d. the first error was to take the eyhaust gas for the turbo from onla one cylinder bank. And the turbo will not help, if the ip is NOT adjusted for a turbe,so a IP change is required.
For higher alritudes a standard DB28 is nit set. There are settings for hight altitudes availabe (Believe me, I had the Standardine setting list once on hand). As well as the turbo setting, also available fro hight altituedes. And for the na engine everything over 1000 feet is hifgt altitude.
The basic design of the 6.2 l engine can handle more power than the 150 hp, however, the thermodynamics will tell you, Diesel tuning is much different from gas engine tuning. Therefore the Banks turbo is not the most ideal application.
So my conclusion of all these problems is very simple: keep the engine as it is at 150 HP and the therefore given torque. It is a basically 1980's design.
RPM are not so much a problem, if you stay below 3600. For this the engine is designed and will last quit some time. And the engine needs some 500 plus engine hours for brake in or in the M1009 some 80000 miles.
Wolf
14 years with a M1009
Since 2002 with a 6.2 in a M715 (Engine built in 1984 according to the available documentation, got it new out of the box, when I bought it in 1994.)