Jeepsinker
Well-known member
- 5,399
- 456
- 83
- Location
- Dry Creek, Louisiana
While you have it off, pull the snapring and endcap out of the rocker shaft and see if you find and gunky sludge buildup in there would you?
Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
to much oiling could be a problem depending on valve stem seals or lack of. i remember there was a difference on the lds-2 engine and it was in or ex that got almost no oil by design. low rpm, low pressure springs = don't need much oil. just because you don't see it doesn't mean it is not there. maybe the issue is that you should not see the amount of oil you see at other arms, they could be the problem arms with wear.1/4" should be fine. Though I wonder what benefit doing this mod would gain you. I don't remember top end lubrication being an issue with these engines.
I don't see how more lubrication would be a problem.
Since there is no butterfly throttle in a diesel, there is no vacuum and oil won't be drawn down the guides like it would for a gas engine. The LDS465-2 rocker arm had an extra squirter hole. Assuming that it is like my Reo 400, this oil squirter was used to provide more oil to the pushrod cups. According to the TM, this rocker arm could be used in all other engines. I am going to guess that this extra oil was needed for the higher rpm operation of the -2.to much oiling could be a problem depending on valve stem seals or lack of. i remember there was a difference on the lds-2 engine and it was in or ex that got almost no oil by design. low rpm, low pressure springs = don't need much oil. just because you don't see it doesn't mean it is not there. maybe the issue is that you should not see the amount of oil you see at other arms, they could be the problem arms with wear.
Yes, it is a 1/8" NPT plug.Roger that Rusty. That is also where the auxiliary oil feed lines plumb into. That is 1/8" npt right?
Hm, on the assembly I'm working with, the shaft orientation is kept by a pressed pin on the shaft that fits into a slot on the rear shaft mount.I do believe you may have illuminated my issue. My rocker shafts are installed with the oil ports facing down towards the heads. Apparently the builder didn't know or didn't care about the orientation of the installation. Good job on the wrench by the way, looks heavy duty. Interesting to point out that my shafts have caps held in with snap rings though. I doubt it makes any difference other than being able to clean the inside. But parts like this I usually just drop in my sonic cleaning tank.
the oil holes should face the head shouldn't they??I do believe you may have illuminated my issue. My rocker shafts are installed with the oil ports facing down towards the heads. Apparently the builder didn't know or didn't care about the orientation of the installation. Good job on the wrench by the way, looks heavy duty. Interesting to point out that my shafts have caps held in with snap rings though. I doubt it makes any difference other than being able to clean the inside. But parts like this I usually just drop in my sonic cleaning tank.
This may be the case, doe's the oil path diagram confirm this? I don't have that tm to look at right now.i guess everyone realizes that even with feed holes at both ends, it only gets oil from one end. that is just so front and read heads and rocker shafts are the same part #
maybe not, the diagram looks to show oil only being fed to the rear of the rear head and then it goes down into the block and back up to the front head and dead ends back in the block at the front. doesn't make sense to have been designed that way so i wonder how accurate the drawing is. look at a head gasket or better yet build up oil pressure on a block with the heads off.This may be the case, doe's the oil path diagram confirm this? I don't have that tm to look at right now.
I have some on order and can make you a pattern.I need to get my hands on a set of new style head gaskets. I have an idea brewing but I need a pattern to work from.