Oh, I see! I didn't realize generators are NOT generators!
That's cool, though. I didn't know Honda did that. Pretty smert fellas, them Honda guys.
If you know what a TQG is, then you've seen the GI equivalent:
http://www.drs.com/Products/PESG/PDF/TQG3KW.pdf. I've always jonesed after one of these, but they're a little new and pricey. There's also the fact that it's hard to beat an MEP-002A for simple and bulletproof, and I don't know that the TQGs will be as stout or as field-repairable if/when they're surplused.
We do this shared nomenclature thing a lot in English and it frequently bites people in the butt. It's helpful when somebody cooks up a new word for a combination of existing technologies that does something a different way. It leads to complaints of 'jargon,' but it can be a big help, too. Consider:
1. A device that converts the mechanical energy of a rotating shaft into pulsating direct current by virtue of rotating generating windings and a commutator.
2a. A device that converts the mechanical energy of a rotating shaft into continuous wave alternating current by virtue of rotating generating windings.
2b A device that converts the mechanical energy of a rotating shaft into continuous wave alternating current by virtue of stationary generating windings and rotating field windings.
3. A device that converts the mechanical energy of a rotating shaft into pulsating direct current by virtue of rotating windings and a diode bridge.
4. A device that converts the mechanical energy of a rotating shaft into continuous wave alternating current by virtue of a rotating permanent magnet and stationary generating windings
5. A device that converts the mechanical energy of a rotating shaft into pulsating direct current by virtue of a rotating permanent magnet, stationary generating windings, and a diode bridge.
All of these machines exist. And they've all been called 'generator.' Item 1 is perhaps most correctly called a
dynamo and item 2 an
alternator. But item 3 is also called an alternator and it makes something different than item 2 does. Note also that item 2a and item 2b do the same thing opposite ways (yes, item 2a really does exist in commercial machinery. Just why I can't say). Item 4 and 5 are both recently called 'permanent magnet generators' but there's an older more precise word, '
magneto' that describes them as well.
Then you add in that the thing in the cardboard box sold at the large retailer with an internal combustion engine on one end and (usually) item 2b or item 4 on the other is also called a 'generator' and, yeah, life can get complicated.
And re: diff eqns, Tesla and genius, you can always just take a look at Maxwell's equations if your mind is not sufficiently blown. How he figured that out with the tiny experimental evidence he had still baffles me...