Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.
Under normal braking, I'm sure it would work just fine, and on a four-wheeled vehicle, it would probably be OK in the event that one circuit failed - but with three axles, I can see that becoming a problem. I would just rather retain symmetrical braking by dividing axles.
Yeah, that's what I'd really like to know (without having to disassemble my brakelines) - what size fittings, banjos, etc. I'm made my own flexible brakelines with AN fittings and braided stainless hoses, but for big trucks like these, I'd just have them custom-made. It's really not any more...
Makes sense they would say that because of the tremendous liability involved, but look into this for yourself and you'll find a surprising lack of evidence to support the common misconception that full hydro steering is illegal.
Geez mudguppy, that's a really good point. I totally over-looked the fact that the two axles would inevitably get out-of-balance if it was a purely hydraulic system. duh.
Whoa, how did that happen? I'm only using the springer seat linkage (custom springs/shocks), and I'm going to mount the 4-point harnesses to the seats, and then to the cab/rollcage, so they can float with the seats, but will be anchored to the cabb/rollcage.
Yeah I would have bet money they're forged, but figured it couldn't hurt to double-check. Tacoma only weighs 4000lbs, but I'd also like to be able to use these as recovery points. Would be welding these to 2x2x.120-wall square tubing and 1.5x.120-wall round tubing (part of an extensive...