I was referring to the gear ratios using true tracks driven by a sprocket. if the drive sprocket is 1/4 the diameter of the front tires, you would need the rear axle to have 1/4 of the front axle reduction.
-
Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
deuce to half track conversion?
- Thread starter steelcaptain
- Start date
- 135
- 10
- 18
- Location
- Mt Vernon, WA
I see know what is being said. So one would need a different rear axle with a higher ratio than the front. Of course, a person could also eliminate the propellershaft to the front axle but that would be no fun
- 14,587
- 4,613
- 113
- Location
- Buchanan, GA
I'm seeing a lot more than 3/4" radius difference in those pics. More like 2" or more (1" for the tread, 1" for the linking structure). So that'd be more like a 41" vs 45" difference. Or nearly a 10% difference (9.756%). I know the sprags engage at 7%. (There's no way I'd try this with a sprag M35 due to the "weak" t-case) In sloppy conditions, it'd probably work fine. But given how the tail scrub effect with treads would work, I'm betting on biding of the driveline when there's any solid ground.
On a side note....
Ouverson makes a 4.90 ratio gearset for the 2.5t axles. So one could possibly run a single rear axle and create a drive sprocket for a link setup to balance the ratios.
- 135
- 10
- 18
- Location
- Mt Vernon, WA
does anyone know what the front and rear axle ratios were on WWII half tracks? I would think that would give a good idea of the spread needed as long as the proportion of drive sprocket to front tire circumferences were about the same?
anyway, I don't plan to every try doing this but just wanted to pose it as an academic question and to see if anyone else had attempted it? I think the combination of M35 and tracks would be an incredible rig! Still would love to see pics of the Israeli versions.
anyway, I don't plan to every try doing this but just wanted to pose it as an academic question and to see if anyone else had attempted it? I think the combination of M35 and tracks would be an incredible rig! Still would love to see pics of the Israeli versions.
Not only Eurofy but why did they Electrofy the trucks. My unit had received some of the new LMTVs and one of them had a short in it. There were times you'd drive down the road and the truck would just totally lose all power. It would randomly just cut out and everything went dead. My first concern was what if I'd been in Iraq in a convoy.
Now I'm curious. Who all is actually considering taking on this mod or who at least is drawing up plans for a "future" possible build.
- 14,587
- 4,613
- 113
- Location
- Buchanan, GA
Well I'm not certain about the ratios of the half track. But to use the 2.5t rockwell, the only gearing options are the 6.72 stock ratio and the Ouverson 4.90 ratio set. I suppose someone could use a "brownie box" to also tweak the ratios on the rear axle.
quickfarms
Active member
- 3,495
- 24
- 38
- Location
- Orange Junction, CA
Two options for the rear axle are an auxiliary transmission or use a civilian axle to deal with the ratio difference.
The half tracks were created to deal with two issues ground pressure and traction.
Tracks are still used to deal with ground pressure.
The traction issue was dealt with in two ways. The Detroit locker's development can be traced back to 1941. The second way is by developing better tires.
As far as gear ratios go the front axle is 6.8:1 and the rear is 4.44:1. I found it in a 2009 post on this site.
The half tracks were created to deal with two issues ground pressure and traction.
Tracks are still used to deal with ground pressure.
The traction issue was dealt with in two ways. The Detroit locker's development can be traced back to 1941. The second way is by developing better tires.
As far as gear ratios go the front axle is 6.8:1 and the rear is 4.44:1. I found it in a 2009 post on this site.
Last edited:
- 135
- 10
- 18
- Location
- Mt Vernon, WA
so a M2/M3 rear drive would be just about right for use with a Rockwell front axle for a deuce. 6.72:1 for existing axle and 6.8:1 for WWII. 672 shaft revs per 100 wheel revs vs. 680 shaft revs per 100 axle. If fact the 4.9:1 Ouverson gears are not too far away from the 4.44:1 WWII gears so conceivably you could modify one of the existing M35 rear axles to drive the tracks if you used the lower ratio gear set. It would then be to just pick the right drive sprocket size if not actually using M2/M3 rear tracks.
I still like the idea but not getting any ideas if you get my drift. I still have an M54 to finish restoring.
I still like the idea but not getting any ideas if you get my drift. I still have an M54 to finish restoring.
- 135
- 10
- 18
- Location
- Mt Vernon, WA
Found these images of a model M3 showing the arrangement of the rear axle & suspension
It certainly would be a very substantial project and one which would earn its owner many bragging rights here once done and running. The photo chronicle of the conversion would make for a very interesting thread!
It certainly would be a very substantial project and one which would earn its owner many bragging rights here once done and running. The photo chronicle of the conversion would make for a very interesting thread!
Last edited:
Farmallmilitary
Member
- 238
- 0
- 16
- Location
- Las cruces nm
This truck is used up at our local lake, its a 5 ton though but same idea. I have thought of this before but have not really thought about it. The only way I would use it is in snow. We have a cabin in colorado and during the winter months it is always snowed in, the road to the cabin is an 7 mile forest service road which is not plowed in the winter. We have skied in before but it would be cool to take that. I would not want to drive all the way up there with the tracks so they would have to be removable like these. Its probably not a real practical modification but it sure would be cool.
- 135
- 10
- 18
- Location
- Mt Vernon, WA
Now I am wondering if this idea wouldn't work for my M54 since I have that mega V plow for it and might get work doing private non county maintained road clearing during the winter. I really hate having to chain up.
Not to change the subject but how do G177's do in deep snow assuming a couple of tons of weight in the bed?
Not to change the subject but how do G177's do in deep snow assuming a couple of tons of weight in the bed?
JasonW
New member
- 10
- 0
- 0
- Location
- Chesapeake Virginia
I would think with those wrap around tracks on a deuce, if you used the standard sized ND rear tires and then put the next size up tires on the front or maybe tires from a 5 ton, wouldn't that equal out any possible gear ratio / tire mismatch issues? If the front tire diameter is roughly the same as the overall height of the rear tracks it should work with no problems right?
caliber1
New member
- 995
- 8
- 0
- Location
- Elcho, Wisconsin
Good idea, run 9.00s on the rear, and 11.00s front to make up the difference of the track thickness. Hmmmm......
jatonka
Well-known member
- 1,801
- 57
- 48
- Location
- Ephratah, New York
You would build one to go where no truck could ever go. Half Tracks go places you wouldn't believe. Next move up would be to a weasel or M116 Husky