2nd Owners working Conference
Been busy so have not updated......
Last wed Sen Hewitt called a meeting attended by 4 owners to work out the language and final draft. To my surprise, OMV Commissioner St. Germain & her staff attorney attended along with the Senate staffer who technically drafts the bill and another staffer along with Sen Hewitt.
It was a rather long and sharp meeting at times so I will try to lay out what happened but not necessarily in order as it was quite a round table...
NO ROADBLOCKS
The commissioner and attorney spoke clearly that they were in favor of allowing mv's and were not opposed to hmmwv's and others on road. They were personable, non confrontational, and again truly interested in coming to a solution. The commissioner even mentioned she liked hmmwv's and would like to see one and sit in it.

I almost fell out the chair and quickly realized, they are not roadblocks.
Ultimatum
Sen Hewitt made it clear that we had to get a consensus from owners of the language subject to all parties approval at that mtg. This was the final line in the sand. No agreement- No bill forwarded to committee on Thu and effectively dead for 2 -1/2 years plus. Possible hand grenade thrown in. I was not aware that the Senators can only draft 5 bills for consideration at each session. Sen Hewitt stated that in 2 years, many things could become legislative priorities and if we failed, she could not guarantee to author the bill in the future.
La is not Idaho
Early on it was clearly established the La is not Idaho and that would not fly. Some references to the differences inbetween us.

Also brought up that Ky was too technical and long. It was recommended that the best course would be broad language not nailed down to specifics. No one had the stomach for inspections and regulations, etc at the state level.
Meeting got very messy and dived into many areas. It got contentious early with the off road and on road language and vehicle definition, fmvss standards, ride heights, emissions, min equipment etc
MV Definition approved
I felt my role at this time was to stop the commotion and lets get her done. I asked what is first? Lets iron out the definition. After lots of stuff, the attorney suggested language that he was good on and then everyone felt it was doable and all wording of off road and on road removed also. Definition agreed on and finally progress and lots of the ugly stuff that came up that could have derailed the bill went away.
65 & Interstate
All parties agreed on the 65mph as it had been approved last week. All the La folks clearly stated that the Interstate Restriction was non negotiable and would need to remain. They feel that La could lose part of $600m of federal funds from federal statues and funding/grants. No specifics were offered to back this up but this was their line. We had to accept the restriction or no go.No negotiation on Interstate.
Equipment & Antiques
Lots of discussion on equipment and what was being required. Road block was the older mv's that did not have seat belts or turn signal etc aka 40-60's time line from some of the owners. Agreement to remove ban on antique registration and accept the other min standards to move forward.
So the bill was ironed out and compromises reached from the LA side but not all owners in agreement. Next step is that the owners would have to all be in agreement & accept the bill as is. No more back and forth and a united front at the next Transportation Senate Committee mtg tomorrow with no negative public remarks or bill would not even be brought up. They left and I met with the owners to explain where we were and options. We came to a consensus subject to seeing a copy of the bill.
The staffer drafted the bill language and sent out to all around 4pm. The instructions were clear. All parties approval by 6PM or the Senator would not move it to the committee agenda for the next day. The attorney gave thumbs up and all the owners gave approval.
Attached is what we had to approve.