M1102 Behind M936A2 Wrecker, Looks Great!

[70deuce]

I didn't think there was a chance in **** a M1102 trailer would be level and look good behind a 5 ton wrecker. Looks pretty dam good. The M818 pintle hook height is the same as the wrecker's, about 30 inches ground to inside bottom of the pintle hook so it would also be level behind a M818. Don't know if the pintle height on the 5 ton cargo trucks is the same. Might be higher.

 

[Monkeyboyarmy]

Looks great.....if that REALLY is a wrecker under there . I might put the travel supports up another hole though.

 

[70deuce]

Thinking the same thing but the hook nor the cables hit the front trailer bow in turns. Off road different story. Wrecker body covered to keep wicked Colorado sun off the hoses and seat.

 

[98G]

My M931a2 + m1101, view from the chasecar.

 

[dawico]

It does look great. Nice combo.

 

[jasonjc]

You need to get the bows for the wrecker, it make the cover look a lot better.

Nice set up

 

[engineer233]

Looks good

 

[70deuce]

I do have the bows and a tan cargo cover off a 6X6 Stewart & Steveson. Not bad looking on the wrecker.

 

[Trailboss]

That does look good. How did you get the bows attached?

 

[70deuce]

Trailboss, there are stake pockets in the bed that take the same uprights as a deuce or 5 ton. 5 bow assemblies support what you see. Believe it or not I had to cut a few inches off the cross bow to have the stakes stand vertical. That bed apparently is slightly narrower than the cargo version.

 

[Monkeyboyarmy]

Ohh yeah. I think I'll be using that idea.