ALFA2
Member
- 205
- 2
- 18
- Location
- Phoenix, Arizona
Good eye for detail, thank you for your posting.
ALFA2
ALFA2
Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!
So I wonder how the "multifuel ability" changes with the 18:1 compression ratio vs the deuces 22:1 compression ratio. Would it be possible to put one of those engines in a deuce for lower compression and then get a bigger turbo to make more power and boost. 22:1 is high but my thought is 18:1 compression ratio would be more efficient when adding more boost?
Or another question: with that Oliver engine in a deuce, what engine would be more fuel efficient? I know there are a lot of variables to consider.
The multi fuel design is really a WW2 GERMAN one, USED by them towards the end of the war, just like the alternative fuel and synthetic diesel and oil. The design was LICENSED to CONTINENTRL and other makers.The engine was designed by Continental and sold, and sold, etc.
I found this with a quick search regarding engine life:And at their rated RPM's (2200), they will last 8,000 to 12,000 hours between engine re-builds. If we would govern ours down to 2200 RPM under load, there would not be anywhere as many rods coming out the sides of the block!
If it was a 77 or 770 it would have a 6 cylinder in it. It's a 66.Are you sure that's a 66? looks more like a 77 or 770 I don't believe that 66's or even the 60's had cast iron frames. also I see the PTO lever is on the left hand side of the seat typical of either one of those tractors....... Not saying it's a bad thing it's just that you got more HP than what you thought. along with live PTO and a 283 waukesha I believe as well putting out about 30HP instead of the 60's and 66's 15HP