And you sounded so sure of what your friend said when you came out with the claim that ODI and I were wrong.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
Guess I'm the only one around here willing to put their money where their mouth is.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Big grin :D :D"
Well, I tried to raise some money for the web site. At least it would have gone to a good cause. Even though you aren't up to the challenge I'm still willing to stand by what I said. If your friend can prove me wrong I am still willing to fork up $50 to SS even though you aren't.
Where are you reading this "code"? Is it from state publications like the pdf posted by ODI? If so then you might want to ignore the pamplets and go right to the only ones that matter, the state statutes themselves. I've seen many state manuals have a little disclaimer that they are not a complete list of laws. Even the pdf OD posted starts with
"this booklet has been condensed from the Motor Vehicle Code of Virginia". I've found that some state publications are written with a certain purpose in mind (i.e. if it's about trucking it assumes you will be in commerce and makes no reference to personal use) and don't always cover every little aspect.
Might be an issue of rules for antique vehicles versus those for a vehicle in commerce. An antique truck as a personal use antique vehicle would be exempt from modern safety requirements but if you were to use that truck in support of a business (i.e. in commerce) then Federal safety requirements kick in and what that old truck came with from the factory is no longer good enough and it must meet newer safety regulations. So it all comes down to what the reg itself is about that you are reading the conflicting info in.
Ruppster