• Steel Soldiers now has a few new forums, read more about it at: New Munitions Forums!

  • Microsoft MSN, Live, Hotmail, Outlook email users may not be receiving emails. We are working to resolve this issue. Please add support@steelsoldiers.com to your trusted contacts.

 

FMTV A2 Contract Announced by Oshkosh - 2021 Start Date

fuzzytoaster

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
4,222
2,902
113
Location
Fort Worth, Texas
It looks like Oshkosh took another bite out of the DoD pie. No mention of rebuilds in the article, wording suggests new production only. The A2 units look like an MRAP and an LMTV had an accident. Im going to call it a VOMIT: Vehicle Of Mobile Infantry Tactics.

636536749557935001-fmtv.png

"The Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles A2, as it's called, will comprise 16 models and trailers capable of hauling payloads up to 10 tons and performing a wide range of tasks including support of combat missions and relief efforts."

"It wouldn't be difficult to transform the A2, which is packed with new technologies, into an autonomous vehicle, according to Williams."

"The contract, which Oshkosh won in competitive bidding, is for five years plus two one-year option periods. In its solicitation for bids, the government called for 2,400 vehicles, although that's not a firm figure, as there's no set limit."

https://www.jsonline.com/story/mone...lion-contract-new-u-s-army-vehicle/318640002/
 

Chism

Member
39
2
8
Location
Anchorage
Also appears longer with longer wheelbase with no more space. I’m sure it’ll be safer for soldiers encountering IEDs...but with less maneuverability. I also wonder if all future medium duty tactical vehicles will be armored...essentially bringing an end to civilian access to this class of MVs...???


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

NDT

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
10,169
5,859
113
Location
Camp Wood/LC, TX
Oshkosh was on a roll with design on the M-ATV, but this is the ugliest truck they have ever produced, and they have made some stinkers. So I guess a bigger engine wouldn't fit under the Stewart and Stevenson designed cab, and they were too lazy to retool the cab, so they cheaped out and put the engine back out in front, negating the advantages of the short cabover design.
 

Jbulach

Well-known member
Steel Soldiers Supporter
2,593
2,053
113
Location
Sunman Indiana
Mayb a survivability thing, get the blast in front of your feet instead of directly under you?
 

Chism

Member
39
2
8
Location
Anchorage
FWIW, looks like it might have IFS...

Though, I don’t think I care about this truck...not very relevant to us civilians...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

tobyS

Well-known member
4,820
815
113
Location
IN
Maybe we need to lobby early for the salvage as components. When I saw such large quantity of MRAP's destroyed and the "off the shelf" components totally destroyed, not recovered as components for citizen purchase, it has to be a HUGE factor in government waste. When they are using components that have international specifications, engines, transmissions, axles, cranes, these items should be recovered for the citizens that still owe the public credit card bill on them.
 
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website like our supporting vendors. Their ads help keep Steel Soldiers going. Please consider disabling your ad blockers for the site. Thanks!

I've Disabled AdBlock
No Thanks