Search results

Yes, in fact. It's actually the M105-A1 vs. M105-A2 brakes. (not what I first wrote in post #19, which I have just edited) TM 9-2330-213-14&P / OCT-1990 shows the differences quite clearly...

Who didn't...?:?: :razz:

Gents, this is NOT a WTB ad. Let's discuss the technical aspects and possible solutions, here. No offering - no selling, please! Thank you.

New, corrected info: the wheels on my trailer actually are 16" x 5.5" lockring-TT and have a backspace of 7.8". Clearance between the inner rim and the (Deuce) brake drum is about ½". And the total width measured between outer tire sidewalls is 97-½". Again, these wheels/tires are mounted on...

Just to clarify: there is only one such sleeve, and it is located in the spindle.

FWIW, this... is the wheel you want (not at that price, of course...!), if/when you choose to go for dual configuration. I have an old equipment trailer here (farm-use only; made out of a Deuce frame with stock rear suspension & axles) which has eight of those wheels, running on 7.00R16 "Ë"...

No, that would be almost 93". Because on a Deuce axle, the difference is only 9.75", hub flanges out vs. hub flanges in.

Yes, that can be done... Just keep in mind that your lug nut holes are chamfered on the outside, only - so there's some more work involved. The original M105 flange-to-flange distance of 79" would then be reduced to 68". But, with 14.5s on A3 wheels - dished out, the resulting overall width...

If you still needed any HEMTT driveshaft parts (U-joint; slip yoke, etc...) I would gladly donate them, for the cause of this interesting project.

https://www.steelsoldiers.com/showthread.php?51530-Deuce-Brakes-Locked-Up; posts #12 and #18

Related: https://www.steelsoldiers.com/showthread.php?52619-M105-W-A3-Rims-and-Tires

Loaded radius of a BFG size 9.50R16.5 tire: 14.5" Loaded radius of most any brand size 265/75R16 tire: 15.0" So, what else was done, besides swapping tires/wheels?

So, what about your happiness...:?:

That's correct. Maybe I should have said "late 80's stock seat belt kit - upgrade"... Covered in TM 9-2320-361-20P & -34P, from 1993, LISTED under SPECIAL PURPOSE KITS.

Just be aware of the fact that most of the seat belt kits to be found online aren't exactly the original kit #12301438 for the M35A2. See it described in TM 9-2320-361-34P, Fig. 296 and then compare with the pictures in the ads.

Neither worked for me... Try this one: 292274215854 or simply google: Seat belt kit lap & companion

I'm not saying that it is normal for a starter Bendix to stay stuck in the ring gear; quite the opposite... But these cheap starters just seem to have that bad habit. Easy to confirm (if you have a problem or not): barely hit the starter button and if it remained stuck, then just move the...

Same here...

I tend to believe that your main issue is that after just cranking the engine - but no start. the Bendix gear stays engaged...?? But not, after the engine actually started and ran??? From playing with these engines for a while... I'd say that on most of these 100-Dollar gear reduction starters...

None of his numbers... (As a courtesy, I would have actually checked that list, before posting it...)